my part

 

Wilmer: (Looking concerned) Hey, guys, I think it's important that we talk about the issue of inner city violence. It's becoming a real problem in our community.

 

Wilmer: Poverty and Unemployment: Many people living in inner cities face limited economic opportunities, leading to frustration and desperation. This can drive some individuals towards criminal activities to survive.

 

Wilmer: Systemic Inequities: Deep-rooted inequalities in access to healthcare, housing, and justice can perpetuate a cycle of violence within inner cities, affecting marginalized communities disproportionately.

 

Reasons against Inner City Violence:

 

Wilmer: Law Enforcement and Rehabilitation Programs: Effective law enforcement and well-designed rehabilitation programs can help reduce violence and recidivism rates within inner cities.

 

Wilmer: Now that we've explored the reasons, let's answer the rest of the questions.

 

Where does it happen?

Wilmer: The individuals most affected are often the residents of these inner city communities, particularly the youth, who may become both victims and perpetrators.

 

What are the causes of it?

Wilmer: Our team proposes a multi-faceted approach that includes improving education, creating economic opportunities, and implementing social programs to break the cycle of violence.

 

What tools can be implemented to help solve the problem?

In conclusion, inner city violence is a complex issue with far-reaching consequences. By addressing the root causes, investing in education and social programs, and implementing comprehensive strategies, we can work towards creating safer, healthier, and more inclusive communities for all. It requires collective effort, collaboration, and sustained commitment to achieve lasting change.

project

 Dialogue on Inner City Violence

Characters:

Wilmer

Daniela

Jorge

DANIELA: Inner City Violence - 3 Reasons For and 3 Reasons Against

Ladies and gentlemen, today I would like to address the issue of inner city violence. It is a complex problem that demands our attention and thoughtful consideration. Let's examine 4 reasons for and 4 reasons against this issue, and explore potential solutions to tackle it.

Setting: A local community center where Wilmer, Daniela, and Jorge are having a discussion about inner city violence.

Wilmer: (Looking concerned) Hey, guys, I think it's important that we talk about the issue of inner city violence. It's becoming a real problem in our community.

Daniela: (Nods) Absolutely, Wilmer. It's a complex issue that needs attention. Let's try to understand both sides of the argument. I'll start with four reasons for why inner city violence occurs.

Jorge: Sure, that's a good approach. And then, we can discuss four reasons against it.

Reasons for Inner City Violence:

Wilmer: Poverty and Unemployment: Many people living in inner cities face limited economic opportunities, leading to frustration and desperation. This can drive some individuals towards criminal activities to survive.

Daniela: Gangs and Drug Trade: Inner cities often become breeding grounds for gangs and illegal drug trade, which fuel violence and turf wars between rival groups.

Jorge: Lack of Education and Resources: Inadequate access to quality education and limited community resources can lead to a sense of hopelessness and a lack of alternatives for the youth, making them vulnerable to violence.

Wilmer: Systemic Inequities: Deep-rooted inequalities in access to healthcare, housing, and justice can perpetuate a cycle of violence within inner cities, affecting marginalized communities disproportionately.

Reasons against Inner City Violence:

Daniela: Community Support Systems: Inner city neighborhoods often have strong community ties and support networks, which can act as protective factors against violence.

Jorge: Local Initiatives and Nonprofits: Many organizations are working actively to provide opportunities and resources to the youth, diverting them away from violence and towards positive paths.

Wilmer: Law Enforcement and Rehabilitation Programs: Effective law enforcement and well-designed rehabilitation programs can help reduce violence and recidivism rates within inner cities.

Daniela: Community Policing: Implementing community policing strategies can build trust between law enforcement and residents, promoting a safer environment for everyone.

Wilmer: Now that we've explored the reasons, let's answer the rest of the questions.

Where does it happen?

Daniela: Inner city violence primarily occurs in densely populated urban areas with economic and social challenges.

Where is it noticed with more impact?

Jorge: Inner city violence is most noticed in areas with higher population densities, where the effects are concentrated and felt more intensely.

Who is affected by the circumstances?

Wilmer: The individuals most affected are often the residents of these inner city communities, particularly the youth, who may become both victims and perpetrators.

What are the causes of it?

Daniela: As we discussed earlier, the causes include poverty, unemployment, gang influence, lack of resources, and systemic inequalities.

What are the consequences of it?

Jorge: The consequences are devastating, including loss of lives, trauma, fear, disrupted communities, and a cycle of violence that affects future generations.

What potential solutions does your team propose?

Wilmer: Our team proposes a multi-faceted approach that includes improving education, creating economic opportunities, and implementing social programs to break the cycle of violence.

What tools can be implemented to help solve the problem?

Daniela: We believe investing in community outreach programs, mental health services, youth engagement activities, and conflict resolution training can be effective tools in combating inner city violence.

Jorge: That sounds like a comprehensive plan. If we work together as a community, we can make a real difference in reducing inner city violence and creating a safer environment for everyone.

PARTE 4

 Today I'm talking to 21 year old long distance runner Anne brown who's just returned from the World Championships so Anne how did you feel about your performance in the championships when you haven't raced for a while you've no idea whether you're in sufficiently good shape I'd only had a few weeks of training behind me so I wasn't thinking I'd do brilliantly and it certainly would have been amazing to come first anyway I was happy to get the silver medal it was an exciting race and the crowd was fantastic so what's your training routine like and I do around 25 to 30 hours a week mostly long distance steady stuff I go running through the woods running on roads is pretty dull so I make sure there's always some attractive countryside to keep me interested I get pleasure from seeing the changes in nature but I do have to remember to keep my eye on the time so I can check my pace it's vital to keep pushing myself to my limits do you train every day or do you take a day off the accepted idea is that our professional sports people should have at least one rest day a week so the body can recover I'm not a great believer in that though at my age I find I can keep going without one I do five hours a day and I'd even like to be able to do more than that but I don't want to push my body too hard because that can lead to other problems what about your competitors in races do you get to know them as friends I race against athletes from all sorts of places I wouldn't say I've got friendships with them though I'm sure some of them are really good guys but I tend to keep a professional distance it would be too easy to let friendships start interfering with the way I run races of course at my age chatting about life having fun and a good social life you are important to me I share a house with three mates they're the people I really get on well with so do you have any favorite free time activities let me think I suppose I did when I was a kid but I'm not so sure nowadays yeah I used to take my kite to the top of the hills and fly it for hours in season skiing something that I get into quite a bit when I've got the time I've always enjoyed active things and never really been much of A reader of books or that kind of thing of course I watch TV and play computer games like most people and you get recognized in the street very often very rarely I'm pleased to say I think it would be a bit strange and I'm not sure how comfortable I'd feel about being stopped for autographs and pictures all the time on the whole I find people wanting your autograph a bit of a pain to be honest it happens sometimes when I'm at events and at first you say OK and then after a while you wish it had stop I suppose I did that sort of thing when I was younger it was always such a thrill to meet someone in the public eye so are you planning for the next Olympics well in my sport most people peak in their late 20s so it's important to have an eye on the next five years or so but that's when supposedly I'll be at my best in the immediate future I want to do well of course but I'm concentrating my attention further ahead fortunately I've been injury free so far so I don't have that worry it's no use having fantasies about winning gold medals until I've reached the top of my own fitness and endurance levels then I can start to think seriously about it

 Hi there my name's Tim Tanner and I usually sit with my twin brother Sam Tanner I'm going to tell you about our career Sam and I have been pretty famous as the singing twin brothers for about three years and we've appeared on lots of TV shows including summer holiday special and fun time which is the talent show where we were voted best at you probably saw it it's the one where the people in the act had to be related to each other after that we had four hit singles in a row and I guess the rest is history really people often ask us what it's like to be twins who've grown up looking so alike Sam and I have shared almost every experience and we're never usually apart for more than an hour at a time I was born 10 minutes before Sam so officially I'm the older brother although we do actually have a real older brother Ken who's a year older than us we were born premature you know earlier than we were supposed to be mum says it was hard carrying both of us when she was pregnant and she was quite relieved when we suddenly appeared in October rather than January over two months earlier than expected our Big Brother ken's birthday is in December so we're pretty close in age it must have been tough for our parents with three young boys Sam and I aren't completely identical but most people can't tell us apart it's only mum who never mixes us up even our dad makes a mistake sometimes calling me Sam and my brother Tim because there's hardly any difference in our hair and with the same height and build but as soon as we open our mouths he'll know which one it is by the voice sand is a bit deeper than mine but most people don't even notice that in character we're quite similar we've both always loved music and since we were five we've wanted to be pop stars we've always had a real interest in going out and being sociable too I'm a bit shy though people that know us say I'm not as confident as samy's which is probably true although I'm not exactly sure you know after all you can't appear on TV if you are at school we used to pretend to be each other sometimes for a laugh sometimes we'd swap places for spelling tests but nobody noticed because we got the same marks which were pretty low we were better at sports and both played in the school football team I was also good at basketball but Sam wasn't as keen preferring volleyball for some reason we were both much more interested in music I began learning the guitar and he started proper singing lessons with a private teacher when we were about 13 but a year or so later we both got into dancing in a big way and then we went to a special school where we could do loads of stuff that's turned out to be useful things like drama we share everything and have one phone and computer between us and we get on well almost 100% of the time but of course occasionally we have a row usually about shoes because we share them too but if we both want to wear the same ones for a show then we'll argue for about 20 seconds and then one of us will give in and it will be over we managed to share the computer pretty well without fighting over it which some people might find surprising our image is based on being twins and looking alike and because we both have poor eyesight we enjoy choosing different styles of glasses for performances you know maybe green ones to go with green suits or dark ones with T-shirts and jeans so the glasses are a major aspect of the way people see us on stage and look out for some new looks on our next tour to promote the new album which is called time dance and comes out in a few weeks it's got some exciting new songs on it quite different from our first album soul brothers Sam and I wrote all the new songs together now listen again….

NEWS

Chaos and Outrage After the Death of a Young Motorcyclist in Bucaramanga

July 6, 2023 On a Thursday morning in Bucaramanga, chaos and unrest erupted following the tragic death of 21-year-old Daniel Felipe Ibáñez Martínez, who was involved in a traffic operation. The devastating incident occurred around 7:30 AM as Daniel was riding his blue motorcycle on the exclusive Metrolínea lane, designated for public transport between Bucaramanga and Floridablanca. At the Diamante II neighborhood, he encountered a control operation led by the Bucaramanga Traffic Department to enforce the exclusive lane. The traffic agents signaled him to stop for violating traffic regulations, but he chose to flee, leading to a series of unfortunate events that tragically cost him his life.

Witnesses offered conflicting accounts of what happened next. Some said that an traffic agent threw a cone at Daniel, causing him to lose control and crash violently. Others suggested that the cone was placed in the road to block his escape, resulting in the accident. The traffic director, Carlos Enrique Bueno, denied any wrongdoing by the officers and conveyed condolences to Daniel's family.

News of Daniel's death rapidly spread through social media,  and tensions escalated as the city's motorcyclists' union expressed discontent and resentment toward the traffic agents. The situation escalated, leading to the agents' motorcycle being set on fire, and they had to be removed from the scene for their safety.

Vandalism followed the protests, with groups of motorcyclists and informal transporters causing damage to the Bucaramanga Transit and   Floridablanca Transit.  In response to public demands for justice, the mayor of Bucaramanga announced the arrest of several individuals involved in the acts of vandalism. Additionally, he called for a thorough investigation into the circumstances around Daniel's death to determine if any misconduct occurred. 

 1 The main idea of the news story is the chaos and outrage in Bucaramanga following the death of a young motorcyclist, Daniel Felipe Ibáñez Martínez, during a traffic operation.

2 Daniel Felipe Ibáñez Martínez, a 21-year-old motorcyclist, tragically died after a series of events during a traffic operation on the Metrolínea lane.

3 The incident occurred in Bucaramanga, Colombia.

4 The event took place on a fateful Thursday morning at approximately 7:30 AM. 5 The individuals involved were Daniel Felipe Ibáñez Martínez, the traffic lieutenants who signaled him to stop for a traffic violation, and the city's motorcyclists' union, who expressed discontent and engaged in protests and acts of vandalism in response to the tragic event. The motive behind the protests was the death of the young motorcyclist and the perceived unfair treatment by the traffic agents.

6 The outcome of the main situation presented was chaos, protests, and vandalism in Bucaramanga following the death of Daniel Felipe Ibáñez Martínez. The mayor responded to public outcry by arresting several individuals allegedly involved in the vandalism and calling for a thorough investigation to determine the circumstances surrounding Daniel's death and to address the citizen discontent and disorder.

 

Debate between Juandiego (In favor) and Wilmer (Against):

Juandiego: Hi Wilmer, I understand your concerns about preserving forests, but I believe there are valid reasons to support the destruction of woods and tree cutting. Firstly, clearing woods can create space for infrastructure projects and economic development. This can lead to job opportunities, boost local economies, and improve living standards.

Wilmer: I appreciate the focus on economic development, Juandiego, but we must also consider the environmental impact. Firstly, forests absorb carbon dioxide, helping mitigate climate change. Destroying woods releases stored carbon and hampers our efforts to combat global warming. We need to prioritize the long-term stability of our planet.

Juandiego: While I agree that climate change is a significant concern, we can't overlook the benefits of selective logging. Secondly, selective logging can help manage forests and promote healthier growth. Removing diseased or overcrowded trees allows for new growth and a more balanced ecosystem. We can maintain the overall health of the forests while still utilizing their resources.

Wilmer: I understand the argument for selective logging, Juandiego, but we must remember that forests are home to diverse plant and animal species. Secondly, forests are home to diverse plant and animal species, some of which are endangered. Destroying woods disrupts ecosystems and threatens biodiversity. We need to protect these habitats and ensure the survival of countless species.

Juandiego: I appreciate your concern for biodiversity, Wilmer, but we shouldn't overlook the importance of wood as a renewable resource. Lastly, wood is a renewable resource used in various industries. By utilizing trees sustainably, we reduce dependence on non-renewable resources and lessen the environmental impact. We can find a balance between resource utilization and conservation efforts.

Wilmer: While wood is valuable, Juandiego, we must consider the broader role forests play. Lastly, forests play a key role in water regulation and conservation. They purify water, prevent soil erosion, and reduce the risk of floods and droughts. Destroying woods can have negative consequences for both humans and wildlife. We need to prioritize the preservation of these vital ecosystems.

Juandiego: I understand the importance of water regulation and conservation, Wilmer. However, we must find ways to sustainably manage our forests to meet our societal needs. In conclusion, while there may be opposing views, there are arguments for the destruction of woods and tree cutting that relate to economic development, forest management, and the use of renewable resources. It's crucial to strike a balance that considers both environmental and human needs.

Wilmer: I respect your perspective, Juandiego, but I believe preserving forests is crucial for environmental stability, biodiversity, and climate regulation. We must prioritize conservation efforts and find sustainable alternatives to destructive practices. The long-term well-being of our planet and future generations depends on it.

Juandiego: Indeed, Wilmer, the well-being of our planet and future generations is of utmost importance. It's clear that we have differing viewpoints on this matter, but it's through dialogue and finding common ground that we can work towards sustainable solutions.

SPEAKING EXAMN B2.5

1  Destruction of Woods - Tree cut down

Monologue 1 (In favor of destruction of woods - tree cut down): Ladies and gentlemen, today I would like to present three reasons in favor of the destruction of woods and the cutting down of trees. While it may seem counterintuitive, there are certain circumstances where such actions can be justified. Firstly, economic development is crucial for societal progress. Clearing woods and cutting down trees often paves the way for infrastructure projects, such as the construction of roads, buildings, and factories. These developments create job opportunities, boost local economies, and improve the overall standard of living for communities. Secondly, responsible logging can be an effective way to manage forests. By selectively cutting down trees, we can promote healthier growth and biodiversity in the long term. It allows for the removal of diseased or overcrowded trees, making room for new growth and encouraging a more balanced ecosystem. Lastly, the use of wood as a renewable resource should not be overlooked. Wood serves as an essential material for various industries, including construction, furniture, and paper production. By utilizing trees in a sustainable manner, we can reduce our dependence on non-renewable resources and mitigate the environmental impact caused by alternative materials. Monologue 2 (Against destruction of woods - tree cut down): Ladies and gentlemen, now I would like to present three compelling reasons against the destruction of woods and the indiscriminate cutting down of trees. Preserving our forests is crucial for the well-being of our planet and future generations. First and foremost, forests act as vital carbon sinks, absorbing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and mitigating the impacts of climate change. By destroying woods, we not only release large amounts of stored carbon back into the atmosphere but also hinder our ability to combat global warming effectively. Secondly, forests are home to an incredible array of biodiversity. They provide habitats for countless plant and animal species, many of which are endangered or at risk of extinction. By destroying woods, we disrupt ecosystems and push these delicate species towards further decline, ultimately jeopardizing the balance of our planet's biodiversity. Lastly, forests play a crucial role in water regulation and conservation. They act as natural filters, purifying water and maintaining its quality. Moreover, they help regulate rainfall patterns, prevent soil erosion, and reduce the risk of floods and droughts. Destroying woods can disrupt these vital processes, leading to negative consequences for both humans and wildlife. In conclusion, while there may be arguments in favor of the destruction of woods and tree cutting, the long-term implications and the importance of preserving our forests for environmental stability, biodiversity, and climate regulation cannot be overlooked. It is crucial that we find sustainable alternatives and prioritize the conservation and protection of our natural resources.

2 Selling Soda drinks in Schools

Monologue 1 (In favor of selling soda drinks in schools): Ladies and gentlemen, today I would like to present three reasons in favor of selling soda drinks in schools. While it may be a controversial topic, there are certain arguments that support allowing the sale of these beverages on school premises. Firstly, selling soda drinks can generate revenue for schools. In many cases, educational institutions face budget constraints, and the funds generated from selling soda can be used to support various academic and extracurricular programs. These funds can help enhance the overall educational experience for students by providing resources and opportunities that may not be otherwise available. Secondly, allowing soda sales in schools provides a choice for students. By offering a variety of beverage options, including soda, students can exercise their freedom to make decisions based on their preferences. It is important to teach students about moderation and healthy choices, and providing a range of options allows them to learn and make responsible decisions about their dietary habits. Lastly, the sale of soda drinks can be a means of fundraising for student organizations and clubs. By organizing and running soda sales, these groups can raise funds for their activities and initiatives. This fosters a sense of responsibility, teamwork, and entrepreneurship among students while supporting their extracurricular interests. Monologue 2 (Against selling soda drinks in schools): Ladies and gentlemen, now I would like to present three compelling reasons against selling soda drinks in schools. It is essential to prioritize the health and well-being of our students, and allowing the sale of these sugary beverages can have detrimental effects on their overall health and academic performance. First and foremost, soda drinks are known to be high in sugar and empty calories. Regular consumption of these beverages contributes to the risk of obesity, diabetes, and other health issues in children and adolescents. Schools should strive to create a healthy environment that promotes nutritious choices and discourages the consumption of sugary drinks. Secondly, selling soda drinks in schools can undermine efforts to educate students about proper nutrition. Educational institutions play a vital role in teaching children about the importance of a balanced diet and making healthy choices. By allowing the sale of soda, we send conflicting messages and hinder these educational efforts. Lastly, the availability of soda drinks can have a negative impact on students' concentration and academic performance. The high sugar content in these beverages can lead to energy crashes and decreased focus, making it difficult for students to concentrate and perform at their best. Schools should prioritize providing students with nutritious options that support their cognitive function and overall well-being. In conclusion, while there may be arguments in favor of selling soda drinks in schools, the long-term health implications and the importance of creating a healthy environment for students cannot be ignored. It is crucial that we prioritize the promotion of nutritious choices and provide students with the tools and knowledge to make informed decisions about their diet.

3. Showing Tabacco ADS in kids programs

Monologue 1 (In favor of showing tobacco ads in kids' programs): Ladies and gentlemen, today I would like to present three reasons in favor of showing tobacco ads in kids' programs. While it may be a controversial stance, there are certain arguments that support the inclusion of these advertisements during children's programming. Firstly, tobacco companies have a legal right to advertise their products. In many jurisdictions, as long as they comply with advertising regulations, these companies are entitled to promote their products to the general public. Restricting their ability to advertise during certain programs, including those targeted at children, may be seen as a limitation on their freedom of speech and expression. Secondly, by allowing tobacco ads in kids' programs, we have an opportunity to educate children about the dangers of smoking. Instead of shielding them completely from the reality of tobacco use, we can use these ads as a starting point for discussions about the health risks and consequences associated with smoking. This can empower children with knowledge and equip them to make informed decisions in the future. Lastly, the revenue generated from these advertisements can be used to support educational initiatives and programs for children. Advertising is a significant source of funding for media outlets, including children's programming. By allowing tobacco ads, these outlets can secure the necessary financial resources to create high-quality content and provide educational experiences that might otherwise be unattainable. Monologue 2 (Against showing tobacco ads in kids' programs): Ladies and gentlemen, now I would like to present three compelling reasons against showing tobacco ads in kids' programs. It is crucial to prioritize the well-being and health of our children, and exposing them to tobacco ads can have detrimental effects on their physical and mental well-being. First and foremost, children are highly impressionable and vulnerable to advertising influences. The presence of tobacco ads during kids' programs normalizes smoking and can create a positive association with these harmful products. This can increase the likelihood of experimentation and future tobacco use among children, putting their health at risk. Secondly, tobacco ads in kids' programs undermine efforts to create a smoke-free generation. We have made significant progress in reducing smoking rates and protecting children from the harms of tobacco. Allowing these ads sends a conflicting message, making it difficult to reinforce the importance of a tobacco-free lifestyle and counteracting the efforts made to discourage smoking. Lastly, children's programs should be a safe and healthy environment for children to learn and grow. By exposing them to tobacco ads, we jeopardize their mental well-being and create unnecessary temptations. Children deserve spaces that prioritize their development, without the intrusion of advertising that promotes harmful products. In conclusion, while there may be arguments in favor of showing tobacco ads in kids' programs, the long-term health implications and the importance of creating a safe and supportive environment for children cannot be ignored. It is crucial that we prioritize the well-being of our children by limiting their exposure to tobacco advertisements and fostering environments that encourage healthy lifestyles.

4. Demolishing a Library to build a Night Club

Monologue 1 (In favor of demolishing a library to build a night club): Ladies and gentlemen, today I would like to present three reasons in favor of demolishing a library to build a night club. While it may seem controversial, there are certain arguments that support repurposing the space for a different purpose. Firstly, a night club can serve as a vibrant social hub for the community. It provides a space for people to come together, socialize, and enjoy entertainment. By transforming a library into a night club, we can create a venue that caters to the interests and needs of a diverse range of individuals, fostering a sense of community and promoting social connections. Secondly, repurposing the space as a night club can contribute to the local economy. Night clubs often attract visitors from both the local area and beyond, leading to increased tourism and spending. This can have positive ripple effects, such as job creation, increased revenue for local businesses, and a boost to the overall economic growth of the community. Lastly, transforming a library into a night club can breathe new life into the space and revitalize the area. Libraries, while valuable institutions, may sometimes struggle with declining visitor numbers and limited resources. Repurposing the building as a night club can inject energy and excitement into the location, attracting a new audience and revitalizing the surrounding area. Monologue 2 (Against demolishing a library to build a night club): Ladies and gentlemen, now I would like to present three compelling reasons against demolishing a library to build a night club. Libraries play a vital role in our communities, and their preservation should be prioritized over alternative uses that may not offer the same benefits. First and foremost, libraries are essential institutions for education and knowledge. They provide access to a wide range of books, resources, and information for individuals of all ages. Demolishing a library to make way for a night club undermines the importance of literacy, learning, and intellectual growth within a community. Secondly, libraries serve as inclusive spaces that promote equal access to information and resources. They provide a safe haven for individuals seeking knowledge, a quiet place to study, and support for those who may not have access to books or technology at home. Replacing a library with a night club limits the accessibility and availability of these vital services, particularly for vulnerable or disadvantaged members of the community. Lastly, libraries hold cultural and historical significance. They often house archives, rare books, and materials that are important for preserving our collective heritage. Demolishing a library to build a night club disregards the value of these historical artifacts and erases an essential part of our community's identity. In conclusion, while there may be arguments in favor of demolishing a library to build a night club, the long-term impact on education, accessibility, and cultural preservation cannot be ignored. It is crucial that we prioritize the preservation and support of libraries, recognizing their invaluable contributions to society and the well-being of our communities.